In this paper I respond to epistemologist Laurence BonJour's a priori justification of induction. There should be enough info for those unfamiliar with both the problem of induction and BonJour's particular response to understand the interchange of ideas that is going on. Some familiarity with philosophical concepts is required, however, so go here if you need some terminology explained: http://www.philosophypages.com/dy/index.htm
On a side-note, BonJour teaches at the University of Washington, which is where I attend school.
Here is the paper, it's about 6 1/2 pages long: http://students.washington.edu/mainwt/BonJourPaper.htm
Friday, December 09, 2005
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment